Lab 05: Tables & Fonts Challenge

1 Tables

Using the data set from the reference lab of PNW flights, choose three analytical questions from the menu below, and design a table for each one that answers it in a publication-ready format (using gt), including appropriate column names, titles, captions, etc. Unless otherwise specified, all questions should be explored for flights departing from Portland. Alternatively, please feel free to come up with your own analyses!

• Which airlines had the best and worst track records of on-time departures in each month? Is it different between PDX and SEA?
• Which airlines improved the most in terms of on-time departures over time, and on which routes? Which airlines got worse?
• What cities have the most service from Portland (defined however you like, but do make sure to define it clearly!), and which have the worst?
• By month, what new routes were added or removed?
  • Hint: dplyr’s lead and lag commands could be helpful here
• Finding busy aircraft (identified by tailnum), with “business” defined as:
  • Which specific aircraft (tailnum) are seen most often, for whom do they fly, and on what routes?
  • Which specific aircraft accumulate the most flight time?
  • Which specific aircraft log the most distance?
• Descriptive statistics comparing several characteristics of long-haul vs. short-haul routes (defined however you like, but you must be clear about your definition)
  • the air_time column will be useful here
• Time of Day: are some destinations from PDX “morning” destinations vs “evening” ones?

Note: For some of these questions, you may need to make editorial/analytical choices about what data to include, how to define metrics, etc. For example, it may be the case that improvement/decline in timeliness may be tricky to measure, as naïve approachces may be easily skewed by outliers or by variation in the data. You may choose to exclude certain low-volume carriers, or only include routes that are present throughout the entire dataset, or something else altogether. Make sure your table includes sufficient information to guide the interpretation and comprehension of your analysis.

Make sure to keep in mind the design principles that we discussed on Monday regarding spacing, use of rules, row-vs-column orientation, alignment, etc. In addition to the table itself, provide a short description of your design and its motivation.

2 Fonts

1. Orient yourself to the built-in font library in RStudio.cloud. Using the fonttable() function (along with dplyr or your data-wrangling method of choice), answer the following:

• How many distinct font families (not fonts!) are installed?
• What proportion of the installed font families include bold and italic faces?
• Some font families include many fonts, others include only one.
  • Generate a plot of your choice illustrating this distribution.
  • Compute a table with descriptive statistics about the built-in font library (e.g. mean/median number of fonts per family, etc.)

2. Spend some time on Google Fonts (or a different font repository) and pick out a serif, sanserif, and display font that “speaks to you”.
3. Write a sentence or two about each one, including what sort of scenario you think it would work well for.
4. Install them into your R project as shown in the reference lab, and if appropriate use them in a figure.

3 Deliverable

Your knitted .Rmd file (i.e., the HTML output).